Morocco, like other authoritarian regimes with strong monarchical powers or outright dictatorships, increasingly views ordinary people as tools—instruments that can be deployed to gain leverage in geopolitical negotiations. The North African kingdom has demonstrated a willingness to weaponise refugee movements and migration flows as a means of advancing its diplomatic interests, treating vulnerable populations as bargaining chips rather than human beings requiring protection and dignity.
This strategy reflects a broader pattern among autocratic governments that exploit the desperation of refugees and migrants to pressure wealthier nations into making political or economic concessions. By controlling or encouraging the flow of people across borders, authoritarian states can create humanitarian crises that force neighbouring countries and international powers to negotiate on their terms. Morocco’s actions underscore how migration has become entangled with power politics, with vulnerable populations bearing the human cost.
The approach raises serious questions about international responsibility and the protection of human rights. When governments deliberately channel or redirect refugee flows for political advantage, they endanger lives and undermine the international asylum system designed to protect those fleeing persecution and hardship. Such tactics also strain relations between nations and can trigger security concerns among border countries already struggling with migration pressures.
For Western nations including the UK, Morocco’s strategy represents a growing challenge in managing migration while maintaining diplomatic relations with key regional partners. The situation highlights the complex intersection between humanitarian obligations, national security interests, and geopolitical influence—a balance that increasingly favours those willing to treat human suffering as a negotiating tactic.
Source: Ynet — Original article in Hebrew.


