US President Donald Trump is keen to avoid reigniting full-scale conflict in the Middle East, instead seeking a rapid diplomatic settlement that he can present as an American victory. However, there is a significant gap between this ambition and the actual situation on the ground. After the administration raised expectations of a broad military strike, it subsequently announced progress in diplomatic negotiations—despite no clear Iranian agreement being presented. Trump’s stated preference is clear: secure a win through negotiation rather than prolonged military engagement. Yet the path to achieving this remains uncertain and fraught with complications. The mixed messaging from Washington—oscillating between military readiness and diplomatic overtures—reflects the administration’s struggle to navigate competing pressures and objectives. With tensions high across the region and multiple parties involved in negotiations, the question remains whether Trump can deliver the swift resolution he is publicly banking on, or whether the complexities of Middle Eastern diplomacy will force a more prolonged and costly engagement than the White House would prefer.
Source: Ynet — Original article in Hebrew.




